Ratifying Constitution Dbq Essay

...ConstitutionDBQ During British control of the American colonies, the colonists, even with their own legislatures, didn’t have to worry about running their own central government, due to the monarchial rule under George III. However as soon as the British were kicked out, the problem of governmental power emerged, which caused tension among the founding fathers. Those anti-federalists who wanted to keep the Articles of Confederation and those federalists who were for the adoption of the Constitution can categorize the fight of the founding fathers of what to control the majority of governmental power. Patrick Henry and many in States, such as, Virginia and New York, were strong advocates in keeping the Articles of Confederation. They believed that the governmental power should rest in the states, and the central government should remain weak, which is evident in the seesaw cartoon. A strong central government could cause abuses in power, Henry argued, and that it could cause a “new monarchy”, no better than George III, thus detrimental to the people. In the Federalist Papers, Alexander Hamilton and James Madison argued that the only way to solve major problems such as: different currencies, individual border tariffs, and international trade disagreements, is to unify the states under a strong central government. This central government is to be divided into three branches: judicial, executive, and legislative...

Ratifying the Constitution to the Bill of Rights Essay

618 Words3 Pages

In 1787, the Constitution was written and submitted for ratification by the 13 states, but not everyone agreed with it. There were two groups of though. One was the Anti-federalists, who opposed the Constitution and the other group were the Federalists, who supported it. The Anti-federalists were people who supported the Articles of Confederation because they were doing well under them. They were mostly poor people from rural areas and were supported by the big states. They believed that the Constitution did not secure their rights and gave the central government too much power. The Federalists were mostly the wealthy people who lived in or near city areas and were supported by the smaller states. They believed that the separation of…show more content…

In 1787, the Constitution was written and submitted for ratification by the 13 states, but not everyone agreed with it. There were two groups of though. One was the Anti-federalists, who opposed the Constitution and the other group were the Federalists, who supported it. The Anti-federalists were people who supported the Articles of Confederation because they were doing well under them. They were mostly poor people from rural areas and were supported by the big states. They believed that the Constitution did not secure their rights and gave the central government too much power. The Federalists were mostly the wealthy people who lived in or near city areas and were supported by the smaller states. They believed that the separation of powers and system of checks and balances would protect the United States from being a monarchy. Both the supporters and the opponents will compromise over ratifying the U.S. Constitution. In the end, the Articles of Confederation led to Shay’s Rebellion and the needing of a Bill of Rights in our new Constitution. Federalists such as Thomas R. Frazier and George Washington supported the constitution because they believed that while under the Articles of Confederation people were melancholy, trade was inadequate, and Europe looked down on them. (1) They saw the complaints of the Anti-federalists and the complaints of other federalists and what the articles were doing to them. The Federalists knew that the causes of the complaints were

Show More

One thought on “Ratifying Constitution Dbq Essay

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *