Accepted For Value Return Without Dishonor Nunc Pro Tunc Assignment

An Overlooked Idea

There is one single overlooked Idea in the commercial activities we are involved and engaged in and too many thoughts may overshadow the answer.

Whatever venture we are engaged with, we will be unable to make settlement because, there is no CLOSURE on the issue. The reason is there is no return to the SOURCE. That return cannot be made by dollars because dollars are measured in whole numbers. A return to the "source" must be made electronically so therefore the units of measure must be in International Units of Revenue - Not Dollars - Re-Venue. You should not attempt to purchase something that is in the wrong venue- You need to be in the Re-Venue. And since we identify the International Unit as Revenue, that is what must be used to pay a bill. The only way we have found to obtain Revenue to do this -is to have your tax preparer file Federal Tax Form 1099OID on the issue and ask him to give you an advance on the tax refund. The tax refund comes from the "SOURCE" as that is where the 1099 report returns to the "SOURCE". You must remember that the Revenue travels in electronic circuits in return to the source. Dollars are not eligible units to travel electronically as they are measured in whole numbers. Dollars go wire transfer which originates with a debt instrument.

Maybe I can simplify my comments by saying you might take your bills to H & R Block and ask them to file the Federal Tax Form 1099OID on your issues and give you the advance on the tax refund. H & R Block will get the tax refund based on the discount to maturity. Thus your advance will come in tax paid dollars, a closed escrow no longer open to the public. It is these open escrows where criminal charges are taken from and assumed when escrow closes, with the voluntary 1099 tax report. There is no longer anywhere for "agent Provocateurs" to assume charges from. All the actions against us come from open escrows, so after filing Federal Tax Form 1099OID on the issue, the tax is returned to the "SOURCE" and escrow closes.

I don't believe that a case can be maintained against one if the 1099 is filed and the Escrow is closed - because that tax is now paid - no debt! So, the escrow is still open, (and that is where the assumed charges come from.)

The guilty / not guilty issue is applicable, but only in tax deferrals as that is where they assume their charges are from (open escrow). But when we get the tax preparer to file the 1099OID on the particular issue in question, the dollars become Revenue (a tax) by the voluntary confession and return to source, Treasury Direct # (your/the SS#). This "source" is a mutual fund held by the county attorney and that mutual fund was purchased with a BLOCKED GRANT that used your foreign credit blocked therein to enable someone (agent provocateur) to assume the use of these funds in a true bill against you. Adolph Hitler had a conversation with his finance minister in which he said things that will make clear where contrary claims come from. This was discovered in the book "The Twentieth Century Journey" - by William Shirer, where he tells of Hitler's question to his finance minister. He said, "We have made the political decision to build up our military in violation of the treaties so, how are we going to finance the buildup?" The finance minister said, "First you will need to use the printing press. Second, we have confiscated enormous amounts of Jewish property, and third, we will block the foreign credit that will enable you to use the credit of your political enemies to build up your military."

So, what you see there is the formula for a Blocked Grant as the means to derive foreign (PRIVATE) credit from the rolls of residents of Municipalities in the county that is run by the county attorney and the one who prosecutes you on charges therefrom. These BLOCKED Grants are the credit used by the county attorney to purchase Mutual Funds that are the "source" of Revenue used to finance the product of those who bring bills against you. These Mutual Funds are the Derivatives used to finance the IMF and are the "source" the 1099 instructions refer to. So when we get a bill from a merchant or vendor, that bill was financed by the "source" that is measured in International Units that can travel in electronic circuits in return (tax return) to the source. WHEREAS, Dollars measured in whole numbers cannot pass through an electronic circuit. Here is where the bill must be reported voluntarily on Federal Tax Form 1099 01D to identify those dollars as tax revenue and thus eligible to pass to the "source" for settlement and closing in exchange. Treasury Direct # (your ss#).

Another way to identify the "source" (mutual fund) is the source is exempt from state and municipal taxes but not Federal. That the reason to file Federal Tax Form 1099OID on the particular issue, is to tax the sum of the bill back to the source. H & R Block can do that as you take your bills to them and have them report on the said 1099OID and you can get an advance on the tax refund immediately. They advertise on TV how fast and easy you can get an advance on your tax return. Everyone assumes a tax return is a 1040, but there are lots of tax reporting forms and the 1099's are some of them - only they are voluntary reporting. They are not mandatory like the others. But nevertheless the reporting identifies the "source" as a "small claim" expressed in International Units and eligible for a Judgment to Enforce Tax Recovery in small claims court. (That Judgment can be extended to say an order for release of prisoners held as collateral. Thus this becomes a Habeas Corpus.). The quiet title and Ejectment actions would only apply after the said 1099OID return is made as it is after getting the escrow closed by the tax return to the "source" that one has actual settlement in fact.

I don't think the mirror image is going to have much effect with the business because the mirror is relating to things and accounts of whole items measured in whole numbers, and we are talking about charges that can pass through electronic circuits as a matter of fact - so it looks like this reduces the idea down to a very small unit of a single "source" thus one world order. With that idea in mind we don't look at a credit as opposed to a debit like in a mirror image, but the two are one and the same, thus one world order. I think the accrual accounting methods will bear this out.

It is the national currency that is not eligible to pay these debts, because the International Units I am referring to are derivatives leveraged one thousand times or one million times- The numbers we need not be concerned with. We only need be concerned with the bill we have for ourselves to make settlement on. That is done by taking our bills (includes indictments) to the H & R Block tax preparer and request he file 1099OID on the issue for return (a tax return) to the "source", (the Mutual Fund) for settlement and closing in exchange Treasury Direct. Then after filing the said 1099OID, ask for your advance on the tax refund. You will be paid the discount to maturity and H & R Block will get your tax refund to balance their books.

Something else should be said here about National Currency. These are issues from our National (Federal) Reserve and are not international currency. The International Currency (IMF) derives from Municipal Reserves (Mutual Funds) that are obtained by the county attorneys like I mentioned earlier and are a small claim by virtue of the International Unit of measure used to account the sum of a bill. Thus a small claim court is an International Court.

When admitting to be a debtor in possession is to admit to a tax liability because the debt has not been paid. One must Request the 1099OID be filed on the issue to settle the tax liability. There must be a Return to "source" for settlement and closing. So it is the National Reserves that created national currency. It is Municipal Reserves that create International Currency (IMF). These each have a different value and different character to their nature, thus the national currency dollars cannot pass through Electronic Funds Transfer circuits like International Units of Revenue does. It's like speaking a foreign language one to another. (End)


The central idea is in the Federal Tax Form 1099OID that I have written about, but now, to advance into action for the remedy, we here have discovered that the small claims court has two main reasons one can file for action. First is the $3,000.00 dollar limit (that we cannot use because it doesn't provide enough relief dollars to settle the controversy), so, second it provides for one to sue for TAX RECOVERY. Now we are getting somewhere. This small claim action enables us to obtain enforcement of the Federal Tax Form 1O99OID issue, because that filing is voluntary and it defines the small claim issue, because that filing is voluntary and. it defines the small claim issue as a TAX, requested to Return to SOURCE, So, that is eligible in the small claim, court to sue for TAX RECOVERY "defined "in the Federal Tax Form 1099OID request to file and return the issue to SOURCE.

Now when the request for the Federal Tax Form 1099OID is refused/dishonored you can file the "small claim" on small claim court with the dishonored contract being a contempt of court, whereby you send the sheriff to purge the contempt by obtaining their check for the amount of TAX RECOVERY sought, and release to your possession of all the property in controversy, or, arrest and take the offender into custody and" held until he pays.

Now, here is where everyone fails in their thinking, because, how does one cue for, say $200,000.00 - in a "small claim" when the dollars amount appears to exceed the $3,000.00 small claim court limit. Here is why!

The US Dollar amount is the venue, and is a delinquent tax issue in a deferred debt somewhere. So, what you are pursuing is a Tax Recovery that is expressed in International Units of Re-Venue, thus a new venue or Revenue, (Accrual accounting brings it back to -0-.)

The reason this is, is because the tax recovery revenue is in negative numbers (less than 1 whole number) and qualifies as a "small claim", whereas, the claim in dollars are "assumed" to be in whole numbers. Therefore you can see the difference between delinquent tax "dollars" and delinquent Tax Recovery "Revenue". The revenue is the "small claim" (exempt) and the Dollars are delinquent tax deferrals in debt instruments held by someone (probably by the county attorney). (Statutes at Large - not a small claim).

Once the issue is returned to "source", that amount is eligible to be paid in dollars (tax paid dollars pre-paid.) So the property and the dollars must be released to you as a matter of public policy and it contains the real amount of damages one would otherwise have sustained and expressed in Dollars. So, with that in mind, I think it good idea to name the county attorney along with the SBA or bank(s) or whoever had an active role in taking the property in question. Probably those who are paying the delinquent dollars in alleged taxes that are not yet returned to "source", thus they are delinquent taxes eligible for TAX RECOVERY action as a small claim as said above.

So, I hope you can see the full scope of the action to take for your remedy. When you fully absorb the meaning of all this you should begin to realize why there is no remedy in any court most of us have observed these last years. The basic reason is, because everyone has expressed their claims in whole dollars whether dealing with government, corporations, or agency, and since those are all offerings of Revenue, they are dealing in International Units of Revenue, not dollars. We have simply not been speaking the same language and everyone goes down in defeat as a result. Also, a basic flaw with everyone is that the claim must be "confessed" volunteered, (on 1099) and not protested, because the protest causes a barrier to the Tax Recovery as a dishonor and our accusers use the dishonor as their revenue in a tax deferral until we are able to obtain the "small claim" judgment to compel them to return (a tax return) the issue to the "source".

Then too, you will not want to refer to your "small claim" in any plural reference. The small claims court, using the plural reference, is the public claim of collective and multiple claims of dollars that need a Broker to break them apart for you and there are no private individuals identified as the filing of 1099 is not mandatory, thus it is an individual, single private claim. So, that claim is singular, "a small claim", even though there may be numerous public entries into the account. So, keep your reference to your claim a "small claim" in small claims court. It is thus an identifiable tax charge when the Request for Federal Tax Form 1099OID is requested on the issue to return to the "source".

Thus we have a voluntary tax to report "income tax", etc.. The voluntary request for the tax report marks the item as a private account exempt from lien or levy. (Income Tax is voluntary and not mandatory). It is drawn in by magnetic energy/charge, thus a withdrawal, being the method of taking it into account. (attraction!)

In a letter I had sent, I had made a request for the Federal Tax Form 1099OID that went to the County Attorney, et al, and it includes a request to return/release all my property subsequent to this issue. (That includes my body). That is the acceptance and return of their offer of the bond amount that was set on me in court. So, his dishonor of that request is the cause for my "small claim" for TAX RECOVERY in small claims Court. (The Dishonor is a Treasury Bill, in this respect, eligible for commodity market exchange.)

So we can see in all of this that the "source of issue" is the tax payor and the "Tax Recovery" or tax return is the tax collector, so, we (or our straw man) are both payor and collector but we have this accomplished by our employees (IRS, Corporate, agency, etc.). This is why we request of "them" to file Federal Tax Form 1099OID to identify the issue as a delinquent tax that we can sue for "Tax Recovery" and subsequent release and return of property.

With that I think you have enough information to start an action for recovery of your property and the revenue to operate it. Maybe we are looking at a new frontier and new settlements on that frontier.

1099OID Notes on November 17, 2005

It can be seen from the chart that gold increases from grantor to the Federal Reserve. This is showing the use of derivatives to enlarge the super-fund. But -for- the Bill to return to the Federal Reserve via the U.S. Agent, the Federal Tax Form 1099OID is needed to identify the currency as Revenue and not tax delinquent dollars. This simply means the issue identified by 1099 must return to the "source" before the resulting property can be returned or released to the owner. Because, whoever is the agent who receives the return to source must pay the amount to the owner at owner's request to balance his books. So it is the issue returning to SOURCE that brings the charge to neutral, whereby the amount paid out to owner is - tax paid dollars (pre-paid) and debts are gone from the account. The exemption is merely the tax charge going to -0- in the agents trust account after returning to the owner the tax paid dollars. The agent doesn't get the exemption until "actually" paying the owner (although he probably assumes he has it - so this is the reason Federal Tax Form 1099OID should be volunteered to displace the assumption with a fact). The request for your agent to file Federal Tax Form 1099OID on the particular "issue" identifies the agent as a tax protestor if he fails to do as you ask.(Ye have not because ye ask not!)

The problem is with the whole numbers we have had in dollars that the HJR-192 chart shows as expansion of gold (increase.) But the increase that occurs or seems to occur because of so many more dollars to represent a particular property item. Even though there are more dollars representing the value of a particular property, the property is still the same and has not increased like the dollars seem to have increased. So the problem is to realize that there are two different values put on a dollar, as one is U.S. Dollars expressed in whole numbers and the other in Revenue expressed in International Units of Revenue, leveraged by brokers and attorneys by Derivatives attaching a municipal tax account and increasing the debt by (000) adding the 3 zeros to multiply the Revenue into International Units of Revenue. Thus there is an illusion of inflation and expansion of the property value, when actually what happens is the account goes "inverse" and the numbers being negative go forever small - (thus the "small claim" in a small claims court.)

It seems we must go from our OLD values of whole Dollars into the new values of Revenue, as the increased numbers identify the property that was represented by lesser dollars of earlier or prior issue, (thus priority). So here we find the reason for voluntary reporting of a Tax to charge a return to "source". (Thus the tax is charged to close the circuit where there was no charge before) because it was "assumed" and thereby no charge. It was trumped up to accuse the victim with an "assumed" probable cause that forces the accused victim to voluntarily accept/charge a tax return as a matter of fact to "displace" the assumed charges, which is no charge that continues as a tax deferred debt until a Tax Charge in fact returns the issue to the "source". Thus the reason to ask for, Federal Tax Form 1099OID be filed on the issue. (That request identifies the particular issue as a delinquent tax - which changes to whole numbers of value to International Units of Revenue which the prior dollars have been multiplied by 1000 (1K) as a mill levy to increase revenues in the international community.) It is a voluntary request for the Federal Tax Form 1099OID that identifies the energy charged in the property to enable an identification of private property to be made. Without that request (voluntarily) the particular "issue" in question is assumed to be public property and the prior debt continues on in a tax deferral of some sort, gathering interest increasing the national domestic debt.

So the biggest problem I see, is that people have all these theories found in research of the statutes, but they fail to grasp what happens to a Dollar when its value changes one thousand times itself. One must volunteer the tax Information so the issue (the body) does not fall Into Execution of Law. Executions are unlawful as the tax (1099) is not mandatory, so they must be voluntary to enable the taxed issue to return to source and settlement, and CLOSING in exchange can occur. This cannot occur by an execution (public law) but by agreement, because the redeemer does not live in false claims. If we agree and accept the probable cause alleged, and request Federal Tax Form 1099OID to tax the issue back to the "source", there is no longer a false claim, and the debt can be redeemed by the tax charging the circuit (escrow) to close in settlement.

Let's say a debt from a mortgage is the issue.

Mortgage - $1,000 - Dollars - Mortgage is sold to new owner who multiplies to - $1,000. X 000 = $1,000,000.

The $1,000,000 is the new value on the body (property) for which community service obtains grants (blocked grants) in lieu of the taxes they can no longer pass bonding issues in the local community. (The people vote them down.) The funds are raised by assuming tax revenues from the victim's municipal tax liability, from which they obtain cash advances by bidding and holding mutual funds that provide liquid funds for public use (deferrals) while the victim's account in the municipality has been charged as collateral on the advance, a tax liability. (Blocked Grants are funded with foreign credit which enables the "agents provocateurs" to use the credit of their political enemies to carry out their sinister purpose). Are we not foreign to the public, being private?!!! Then whose credit has gone into the Blocked Grants? Are these from H & R Block? H & R Block stock trading in the market?

So unless there is a voluntary request for reporting the said tax, there is "no fact" to identify property free of tax liability. So no matter what sort of rationalizing one does to use administrative and court procedures to set off or set aside, or otherwise discharge the debt obligation, to dispose of the debt, one cannot get rid of the debt, because the public has no mandatory powers to redeem debt "issues" but only use deferrals that declare the debt paid but is only deferred into the hands of someone who agrees to hold the debt - in whatever type the interest bearing debt is placed.

So the one option to all of this is to "volunteer" a Request to File Federal Tax Forms 1099OID to charge the tax on the "issue" for its return to the "source". Now there is "a fact" to take the charged issue into account and dispose of the debt by the balance going to -0-. Now some of the administrative procedures might work, because the dollars have been taken from the old venue U.S. Dollars and re-issued in the new Re-venue as International Units, a "small claim" eligible to file for Tax Recovery in small claim Court.

So, one can see the old venue dollars do not have the same relative value to particular property that the Revenue has, as the county has taken all their tax accounts and sold or traded them for Revenue measured in International Units that are Mutual Funds valued in this assessment multiplied by 1000 (1K). These Dollars of Revenue are now a "small claim", because they are voluntarily identified in the request for Federal Tax Form 1099OID to tax the particular issue back to the source, and are eligible in small claims court to sue for Tax Recovery and obtain a judgment to enforce the "return to source".

I can't stress this enough, that it takes the individual effort to request Federal Tax Form 1099OID to be filed on the "issue" to make it a "small claim". Any other effect leaves the dollars in the account delinquent, because they do not have the means to become a "small claim" until the principal accused requests the tax be reported and taken into the new venue called Revenue. After this occurs, then the dollars can be sought in small claims Court. After this occurs, then the dollars can be sought in small claims Court in a Tax Recovery action. But without the request for the tax report (1099) the dollars are delinquent contraband, because they have not been identified as tax revenue and they are not eligible as a "small claim" to enforce recovery. They must go to the "source" dollar for dollar to fulfill HJR-192 as a matter of public policy, and when that happens, the property expressed by that debt becomes free of debt.

The foregoing explanation might not be perfect in its identification of the subject's relative matters, but is should improve your outlook on the problem.

More thoughts on the 1099OID - Jan 9, 2006

Let us discuss the nature of what sets the perimeters for a tax return. The word return means to go the opposite way, and we have always thought of taxes as indeed something we paid and sent away from us. So, if that be so, then to return would come back to us. So, the word "withdraw" would be an expression that describes this. But first one should examine the tax in relation to return. If our opponents "assume" they are exempt from tax they also assume we are libel for the same - thus they accuse us, thinking we must pay. So we need to identify the "source" of the taxable revenue so we know where to return to "source" as per the purpose of Federal Tax Form 1099OID. That suggests the "source" belongs to us and the 1099 report confesses the return to the source. So, now we need to prove this in both Federal and State positions on this. This then puts the matter under the Superintendant of a Federal Project to regulate the Funds from the source into commercial use and then back to source.

You remember, my mention of a Blocked Grant,, that is used by a county attorney to use the credit blocked yours and my foreign credit - we are foreign to the attorney at Bar to purchase the mutual Fund that in turn uses those funds to purchase municipal bonds that they claim are exempt from State and Municipal taxes, but they are not exempt from - Federal tax - thus Federal Tax Form 1099OID. It is these funds that finance all the products that bills arise from in the municipal construction contracts and related Federal projects.

The Municipal Funds are the "source" for which the tax returns to. But remember, it was our credit that the county attorney used to purchase those same said funds. So, when we volunteer to file/report Federal Tax Form 1099OID for the issue to return to "source", we have sent the confession back to source and since it is only a confession, as there is no money, as per HJR-192, We are entitled to a tax refund (Because the confession admits the amount of tax but does not pay any). So the principal is eligible for the tax refund.

It is suggested that H & R Block do the tax report and provide you with an advance on the tax refund. But no doubt they will demur or otherwise dishonor the request. So now the dishonor has the bills incorporated into the negative contract and identify the principal, both negative and positive identities. The Dishonors is the contract in fact and eligible for one to ask the H & R Block agent to place the Request for Federal Tax Form 1099OID be filed on the issue for return to the "source" and issue an advance on the tax return. The H & R Block agent can now be asked to place the request with a Supervisor to complete as said above, The supervisor is the agent of the superintendent of the Federal Project, and the H & R Block agent has the obligation to file but refuses and creates the Dishonor which is eligible for the supervisor to enter the superfund (municipal and Mutual Fund) for the advance requested.

So the Superintendent of the Federal Project is where the Federal tax authority comes from as the states cannot create their own specie! Thus it is the Supervisor who has the authority to enter the super fund for the tax refund. He has the super"vision" to see the "small claim" expressed in International Units of Revenue. (Now the body can see! - Is that a bill of lading?)

It might help to remember that the individual accounts that are derived (Derivatives) from the tax roll of a municipality are considered "residents" thereof; and it is their credit that is Blocked into, and with a Federal Grant, being as foreign credit of political enemies, that is used by the County Attorney to purchase the Mutual Funds that subsequently funds the municipality for all their social and mechanical construction projects technically regulated or governed by the Corp of Engineers (Army Corp of Engineers). (The social security number as an Electronic Profile terminal is probably the transmitting utility.) This is all under the Superintendant of a Federal Project. (A Supervisor!) (Governor of the Fund). But now to further understand how this is organized is to identify who and what the Army Engineers really are. When Abe Lincoln pressed the Civil War on the Confederate States, it was to preserve the UNION. Now!! What Union is that? Is it not -the "Union of Operating Engineers", who have exclusive credit to bid on Municipal construction projects, thus first access to Municipal Funds, for approved projects? And are not the NATO forces of Europe the "Union" deployed in foreign service? Thus we have the merger of the metric system of Europe with our system. The metric system being negative numbers going to infinity! And is not this negative connection (Union) the nexus for Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) between Public and Private bank accounts? (Euro funds on dollars are US Dollars in private accounts).

So, with that in mind it appears that the Euro dollars are expressed in International Currency. (Because the metric system represents the Euros on the East side of the decimal point, and US currency is on the West side expressed in whole numbers) Somehow, I suspect, this nexus or Union is bound together for the One World Order (A money order). (Thus equal partners, where credits equal debits bound into contract, by Dishonour, and the resulting Dishonour being the contract in fact; and contains the bill admitting the particular issue from the source (mutual fund); and the acceptance of the bill, via Request for filing Federal Tax Form 1099OID on the issues for return to the source.

It appears that the bill is in national currency (asking for national currency) but since we are dispossessed [HJR-192], we admit/accept the bill and its promise to pay, by Request for filing Federal Tax Form 1099OID on the particular issue, and ask for an advance on the tax refund. It is the Union (nexus) that connects or binds the negative agreement together (Dishonour) to enable the Electronic Transmission to pass through the source and return to the source, both credit and debt now joined together in One Holy Union of Wedlock, thus One World Order for a Re Fund in International Units of Revenue from Euros into US national currency.

The Blocked Grant used by the county attorney to Block our foreign credit identifies the three (3) wise men coming from the east to Fund the particular issue, when referring to foreigners; and since we rely on employees to conduct our business, we request them to file Federal Tax Form 1099OID on the issue for return to source and advance the tax refund. (3 wise men - 000) (3 bags full).

The promise to pay is made by the banker (our banker) and he is the taxpayer - but for our account! And the bank is regulated by the Superintendent of the Federal Project, so it is the Army Corps of Engineers - the Union, that does the Electronic transfer via a supervisor who has' super VISION to enable him to see the "small claim" and give the advance on the Re Fund.

I think an advance may be the only way one can get settlement on the issue, because; the promise to pay is a Federal Reserve Note and that is a future event, so it is the advance that moves us to the future of that promise. (The Passover is the Exchange of the Bill for the Bond - passing over, not through the promise (promised land) which is a foreign land (thus Euros). So, the Union holds the Bill and Bond together in One World Order to establish the Re Fund to be made, or the advance on the same.

So, with that scene in mind you might be able to see that the T-Bill and T-Bond together make up the T-Note (promissory note) and it is the Union of the T-Bill and T-Bond (foreign and domestic) that equals the promise to pay. These two opposing items are bound together in Dishonour, and that fact thereby admits the promise to pay the sum. (The summary to court - small claim, etc..) Thus the shotgun wedding! The honor and dishonor of a commercial contract is one opposed to the other. The 1st is in the venue and the other is the Re Venue!

The honor of a contract is in National Currency! The dishonour is an International Contract (measured in International Units of Re Venue). The Dishonour is eligible to request the supervisor make the settlement as he/she is authorized to enter the superfund for the closing as that is under the superintendant of a Federal Project.

NOTES ON 1099OID - January 21, 2006

I have not been real concerned with the Bid Bonds and the Admiralty because they govern matters of delivery to a distribution point, but does not determine who is the owner, as that is a tax matter in the land, and not at sea where the admiralty has jurisdiction. The matter that needs an answer is what credit or pledge for payment was used to develop the product expressed in the bill of lading on the particular vessel at sea or in the dock. This is what the probable cause is based upon, to accuse the owner there of the international method of identifying the owner, and since that agreement HONOUred would be a national contract that would not be sufficient to settle the foreign claims on the product of international affairs. So the contract of DISHONOUR is necessary to bind the contrary powers together in a negative agreement, and to do this, the particular owner must report the tax, so it can be identified as an International Unit of Revenue,(a small claim), and not national currency (which is tax delinquent). So the 1st step to take when one gets a bill is to Request the accuser (accountant) of the bill to file Federal Tax Form 1099OID on the issue for settlement in return to "source".

Once that is done, the tax identifies the source by which the product of the bill was financed and RETURNED to (a tax return - i.e. 1099OID). This is because the source is your SSN# Treasury Direct and cannot be reached for settlement unless the tax report passes through the electronic circuit connected to your social security account number Treasury Direct, (Corporations do not have social security numbers and cannot reach that account except through your very - own SS#) (All the Admiralty proceedings and Bonds bid and issued thereby are irrelevant, because they are all dependent upon the original Issue of Capital that financed the creation of products that the Bill arose from; and it is the mutual, fund and Municipal Bonds purchased and held in the county, exempt from state and Municipal taxes, that funded the engineering and construction of the product you are billed for. But that product is not exempt from Federal Tax, thus Federal Tax Form 1099OID is in order to file on that particular issue which identifies the owner at Treasury Direct. That is identified in the accrual accounting.)

So, you see from the association and nexus of events the admiralty proceedings are not the issue. The issue is the tax report 1099OID (Original Issue Discount) to connect the mutual fund and Municipal Bonds financing of the product to the end user and owner of the particular product and issue, for the tax return to source. This is what the Federal Project is, that authorized the county attorney to block our credit in the municipality where we are Residents thereof and use that Derivative to finance the International Operations using the BID bonds for mechanical and social engineering of consumer goods and services that are pre-paid at the source and Federal Tax Form 1099OID identifies that issue for return to the source for settlement and closing in exchange Treasury Direct: This all falls under the Superintendant of a Federal Project who oversees the cost of production return to the source, from the "mutual" fund in the Blocked Grant, to the construction project of the Municipal Contract and the tax return to the source to identify the source of Original Issue, (Thus the reason for Federal Tax Form 1099OID (Original Issue Discount), a pre-paid event!

I hope you are able to follow through what I described above. You need to see the county attorney "holds" the "funds" (Mutual Funds) that fund the Federal Project mentioned and those same said funds are that Pre-pay all the bills arising from the product thereof. When you receive a bill for a product of those Original Issue Funds, you need to request Federal Tax Form 1099OID be filed on the issue to identify your account from which the county attorney took your credit and purchased - Bid for the Mutual Fund which pre-paid your account with those funds now identified as International Units of Revenue - pre-paid! It is the "Union" of operating Engineers that use that credit to purchase all raw materials and Labor to produce and finish the products you use and receive a "Bill" for. The Bids (Bid Bond) are all Municipal Contracts (Construction Contracts) that must have your acceptance of the finished product to certify the contractor's completion of the product - all under the Superintendant of the Federal Project as said before. Thus, to prove pre-payment one needs to request Federal Tax Form 1099OID be filed on the particular issue for return to source for settlement and closing in exchange Treasury Direct.

So, from this you should see that the county attorney holds the funds that pre-pay the bills you receive for what you use, and the Superintendant of the Federal Project Supervises the tax return to the source to identify the pre-paid funds as yours by a charge to the electronic circuit via the Federal Tax Form 1099OID as said before. The state and municipality are exempt from making this determination. It is a Federal Matter, because the revenue is pre-paid in dollars as the State cannot issue its own specie.

1099OID NOTES, February 11, 2006

Hopefully you can now see that no matter what part of a financial account in which one has involvement, it still is eligible for one to Request Federal Tax Form 1099OID to be filed. All accounts, whether credit or debt, are inter-related and part of your account if you request the reporting and filing of it. So for example we showed that a commissary account here at the prison is one such account they are .obligated to file at the inmate's request, even if they claim not to be libel for the Indictment (True Bill) or the Appearance Bond, etc., because even the commissary account is connected to all other accounts. So, from this I hope you can see all transactions connected to our names (idem sonans Strawman name) are reportable this way and admit to zero, -0-. Why -0-? Because the Mutual Fund was purchased with credit - nothing more. But, it was our credit. And when reported on 1099OID, it goes to -0- whether it is reported as a credit or debit. If the report shows us as recipient rather than payor, then where is the amount paid to us? Who has it now? So, whether the 1099OID report goes as a credit or a debit to our name, it is still -0-. So, one should take all his receipts for credits and debits to H & R Block for preparation and filing; and ask for an advance on the tax refund.

When one gets a bill [presentation] for something and accepts it for value and returns it for settlement, and that settlement is refused or otherwise Dishonoured, that Dishonour is an International Contract eligible for one to request it be placed with a Supervisor for payment/settlement in International Units of Revenue [Re-venue] the Supervisor is authorized to give the tax refund identified in the contract of dishonor). The Supervisor is an administrator of the Super-fund (the IMF) and the value is recognized by reporting the tax on the 1099OID. But, it is when the 1099OID request for reporting is dishonoured that that fact is eligible to identify the account as a "small claim" (International Units) and returned to the source by the voluntary confession of the tax in the filing - thereby authorizes the Supervisor to issue the tax refund in settlement and closing!

From previous discussions, you were shown how the International Monetary Fund is created - in the County -- and the 1099OID reporting returns the tax to the source (the Mutual Fund); and that is the Federal Project under the Superintendent, thereof. The Federal Projects is to create exchange for the States that cannot issue their own specie. They do that through our own Social Security account at the Treasury.

So, the Superintendant of the Federal Project is to establish Original Issue of the IMF and regulate/govern the issue of Funds (Mutual Funds) at the County of Origin, and place the issues/funds with the banks to fund production of goods and services, and return (tax return) to the source for settlement in closing in exchange Treasury Direct (SSN#) (That's the Federal Project!) Mutual Fund in the County - goes to -- Production of goods and services - goes to (by Bill / Presentment) - Consumer/User (by Acceptance) - and returns to - Source (Mutual Fund in County).

This is the route of the Mutual Fund from start to finish! That is the Federal Project as the State cannot issue its own specie! That is why the fund is not exempt from Federal Tax. We must voluntarily report the delinquent tax i.e. Federal Tax Form 1099OID

If you follow the Blocked Credit to the purchased Mutual Fund and through the banks to the producers of product, and back to the consumer/user (who reports the tax for return to the source) you will more easily understand the Original issue (the Source) is our credit ... probably orally given... and when reported on the 1099OID it is that written confession of the debt that is returned to the source by the operator of the electronic circuit for return to the source! (thus there was nothing there [source] in the first place - and nothing is returned). The account is -0-.

There should be enough information out by now, to enable those in need to consider requesting the filing of the 1099OID; probably taking all invoices and receipts to H & R Block to prepare the taxes. Maybe wait until they (H & R Block) prepare the 1040 or whatever form they propose and give you the bill for the tax [and preparation cost]. Then, request they file that amount on the Federal tax Form 1099OID on that issue for return to the source, and settlement for closing in Exchange Treasury Direct SSN#.

That might be one way to do it. Just give them everything they need to bring your tax reporting current. And, when they give you the bill for tax, that is when you request they report that amount on 1099OID; and ask for an advance on the tax' refund! Even your Form 1040 has provisions for reporting 1099 right on the 1040. I hope this helps to reveal the mystery.

MORE NOTES - February 11, 2006

It is the credit policy that is under the Superintendent of a Federal Project. And, it is for him to set the standards for issue of the Mutual Fund in the County to fund all commerce to produce product of goods and services, and to provide a way for the tax return to source in settlement and closing in Exchange!

In previous notes herewith, this was discussed from a different point of view depending on the question priming the answers. You might pay particular attention to the County Attorney "holding" the Mutual Fund that provides credit for the Operating Engineers contracting for the Municipal needs.

It is the products from these projects that we use and get a Bill for the use. This is the Bill we report to the source because the account is pre-paid by the County Attorney using our credit to purchase the Mutual Fund and let that same credit out to contractors who bill us for product; and when reported back to the source it is acknowledged the account was pre-paid

Thus, there is no other transfer required only the admission of the tax on the issue - which is the Bill!! The County Attorney is "holding" the pre-paid account derived (a derivative) by using a Blocked Grant used to purchase the Mutual Fund that hold" until a tax return to the source is filed. (That's the Federal Project, IMF, in the Federal Grant applied for by the County Attorney in his effort to provide Public Agency funding when no more local bond issues can be passed).


I am almost sure that it is the Federal Tax Form 1099OID filing on the issue that sets a Demand on Deposit into action.

A certain amount of U.S. Dollars on Deposit in U.S. Banks are identified as having a "source", being an issue subject to tax! It is when Federal Tax Form 1099OID is actually filed on the particular issue that a Demand is made on the funds that are connected to the said Original Issue. This is when the tax identifies the same as a small claim or a small business (not of Public Corporations and Agencies created from statutes at LARGE). Thus the 1099OID filing identifies the private claim as a "small claim" and not the Large Public Claim.

Most property financed by this method will be sold-at-auction within 60 days to make the Tax Return to the Source!!! Many less complicated assets are sold within 3 weeks.

Nunc Pro Tunc

You should maybe condition your request for the tax I.D. information (as needed to file the 1099OID) with the term NUNC PRO TUNC. This term may apply to many of your issues.

For example: The request for the tax I.D. # (don't say, 'taxpayer' I.D. #) is for the 1st appearance NUNC PRO TUNC! On other matters too! Nunc Pro Tunc might apply when request is made that it should have been done at the time of Appearance at arraignment hearing etc..

This request is made "nunc pro tune" for the date of arraignment and appearance thereon.



PALISADES,L.L.C. Jack Xxxxx XxxxxPO BOX 12444 c/o 1234 Xxxxx StreetENGLEWOOD CLIFFS NJ 07632 <your town state zip>NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR VALIDATION OF DEBT PER 15 USC 1692g.Dear unknown PALISADES,L.L.C. agent, assigns and associates:Your three unsigned presentments listed below are returned timely and markedµAccepted for value, returned for value, for settlement and closure¶.Definitions1. Jack Xxxxx Xxxxx means, living flesh and blood actual man, non-legal fiction enity.2. The term ³XXXXX, JACK´ means non-living entity, Stramineus homo, Commercial Strawman,artificial entity, legal fiction [ XXXXX means all caps last name] [ Xxxx means upper lower spelling of name]Jack Xxxxx Xxxxxis the authorized representative, signatory and keeper of the business records for XXXXX, JACK and is without sufficient information, verified facts, competent fact witnesses todetermine whether a debt is owed and requires verifcation of the alleged debts and the validity of theclaims below listed: Account Number 123451678-09 $32,239.50 Account Number 123451678-10 $ 5,834.66 Account Number 123451678-11 $ 5,428.88PALISADES,L.L.C presentments are attached µAccepted for value, returned for closure unsignedpresentments from PALISADES,L.L.C.dated Xxxxx 10, 2009, received Xxxxx 13, 2009, and timelyreturned Xxxxx 14 , 2009 for verification of debt. [[to understand the tremendious power of the AFVgo to Yahoo_Groups and join for free. Then while there search for µ1099-A_by_Patrick¶]]Jack Xxxxx Xxxxx, requests PALISADES,L.L.C. to respond within 30 days providing the followingpursuant to FRCP Rule 17 and FRCP Rule 34, failure to respond timely with answer to eachnumbered item below is estoppel :(1) Name of Debt Collector(s).(2) Address of Debt Collector(s).(3) Alleged Account Number for each claimant.(4) Alleged debt owed.(5) Date alleged debts became payable.(6) The name and address of each of the alleged Original Creditor, if different from Debt Collector?(7) If Debt Collector is different from alleged Original Creditor, a bona fide affidavit of assignment of the alleged original contract between alleged Original Creditor and alleged Debtor.(8) Documented evidence of whether Debt Collector purchased this alleged account from the allegedOriginal Creditor.(9) If applicable, date of purchase of this alleged account from alleged Original Creditor, andpurchase amount.(10) Documented evidence of Debt Collector's current interest in account:(a) Owner;(b) Assignee;(c) Other ± explain:(11) Terms of the transfer of rights re this alleged accounts.(12) If applicable, method by which rights of this alleged accounts were transferred.(a) Assignment(b) Negotiation

One thought on “Accepted For Value Return Without Dishonor Nunc Pro Tunc Assignment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *